California | CPA Professional License Defense

California CPA License Defense Lawyer

Defense for Accountants Facing California Board of Accountancy Investigations, Accusations, and Disciplinary Hearings.

When the California Board of Accountancy (CBA) investigates a Certified Public Accountant, the matter may involve professional judgment, audit documentation, financial conduct, licensing compliance, or allegations arising from another regulator.

California has specific procedures for compulsory document requests, investigative hearings under oath, citations, formal Accusations, administrative hearings, and final disciplinary decisions. Understanding the stage of the proceeding is essential to identifying the required response and the evidence that matters.

Ratliff Jackson LLP represents CPAs and accounting professionals in board complaints, investigations, professional misconduct allegations, formal disciplinary proceedings, and related licensing matters.

Our work includes reviewing the governing accountancy law, examining engagement records, evaluating technical standards, addressing investigator communications, preparing responses and hearing defenses, and analyzing possible sanctions and collateral consequences.

Received a formal Accusation? Under California Government Code section 11506, a Notice of Defense generally must be filed within 15 days after service of the Accusation to preserve the right to a hearing. An investigation letter, citation, and Accusation are different documents with different procedural requirements.
CBA Investigations Investigative Hearings Audit and Attest Defense Formal Accusations OAH Hearings License Sanctions
Before You Respond

What Should a California CPA Do When the CBA Makes Contact?

The first question is not whether the complaint seems justified. It is what the CBA is requesting, which law governs the request, and whether the matter remains investigative or has entered a formal disciplinary process.

Title 16, California Code of Regulations, section 52 requires licensees to respond to CBA inquiries and make requested files, workpapers, and documents available within the regulatory period. It also requires truthful responses and prohibits obstruction of board inquiries or proceedings.

01

Identify the Document and Required Response

Determine whether the matter involves an informal inquiry, subpoena, citation, investigative hearing, formal Accusation, or existing disciplinary order. Do not use a deadline associated with another procedural stage.

02

Preserve the Original Engagement Record

Preserve accounting workpapers, engagement letters, reports, tax files, electronic records, communications, quality-control materials, and relevant metadata. Document retention and permissible subsequent changes should be evaluated under the applicable professional rules.

03

Identify the Alleged Violation

Separate suspected fraud or dishonesty from a technical accounting dispute, negligence allegation, independence issue, continuing education deficiency, or reporting obligation. Each may require a different legal and evidentiary analysis.

04

Evaluate Disclosure and Confidentiality

Determine the scope of any compulsory process and whether the records contain confidential client information. The Accountancy Act and board rules recognize confidentiality obligations and specified exceptions. Neither confidentiality nor board authority should be assumed without examining the actual request.

05

Identify Related Proceedings

Determine whether the facts also involve a client lawsuit, employer investigation, criminal matter, Securities and Exchange Commission action, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board proceeding, IRS practice issue, or another state accountancy license.

California's 30-day inquiry rule is not the Notice of Defense deadline. The inquiry obligation under 16 CCR section 52 concerns board requests and cooperation. A formal Accusation governed by Government Code section 11506 generally requires a Notice of Defense within 15 days after service. These requirements serve different purposes.
California's Accountancy Regulator

Who Regulates CPAs and Accounting Firms in California?

The California Board of Accountancy administers the California Accountancy Act, located in Business and Professions Code sections 5000 and following, and the board's regulations in title 16, division 1 of the California Code of Regulations.

The CBA regulates qualifying individual licensees and firms, and exercises statutory authority over certain out-of-state practitioners using California practice privileges. The applicable credential matters when determining the board's disciplinary authority.

Individual CPA Licensees

California-licensed CPAs may face discipline for statutory misconduct, violations of professional standards, failures of required cooperation, or other grounds recognized in the Accountancy Act.

Accounting Firms

Registered accounting firms may face questions involving firm responsibility, attest services, peer review, professional oversight, technical standards, and compliance with applicable registration provisions.

Out-of-State CPA Practice Privileges

California's practice-privilege provisions may authorize qualifying out-of-state CPAs to practice without obtaining a separate California CPA license, but those privileges remain subject to statutory conditions and regulatory authority.

A California CPA license and a nonresident practice privilege are not the same authority. Different procedures can apply to discipline of a California license and administrative suspension of an out-of-state CPA's practice privilege.
Grounds for Board Action

What Allegations Can Threaten a California CPA License?

Business and Professions Code section 5100 identifies grounds for professional discipline. The relevant allegations may also implicate the board's technical, ethical, confidentiality, independence, and reporting regulations.

The CBA must apply the particular law governing the conduct. A civil malpractice claim, professional disagreement, arrest, or employer accusation does not necessarily establish a disciplinary violation.

Fraud and Financial Dishonesty

Allegations involving dishonest conduct, misappropriation, false information, financial reporting irregularities, or breach of fiduciary responsibilities.

Audit and Attestation Deficiencies

Questions concerning audit evidence, workpaper documentation, materiality, sampling, independence, supervision, quality management, or compliance with applicable professional standards.

Gross Negligence and Repeated Errors

Allegations that the quality or performance of professional services meets an applicable statutory disciplinary ground, rather than merely reflecting a difference in professional judgment.

Tax Practice and Client Transactions

Claims involving tax engagements, materially misleading information, improper handling of client matters, or conduct that may also be examined by tax or criminal authorities.

Confidentiality and Conflicts

Allegations involving improper disclosure of confidential information, independence, conflicts of interest, or other enforceable duties in the professional relationship.

Licensing, Education, and Reporting

Matters involving continuing education, peer review, renewal representations, required disclosures, responses to board inquiries, or failure to comply with an earlier regulatory order.

The California Enforcement Process

How a California CPA Board Investigation Develops

The CBA can investigate complaints and potential violations under Business and Professions Code section 5103. An investigation may conclude without formal charges, produce a citation, or lead to a formal disciplinary Accusation.

The board's Enforcement Division may review documents, obtain information, consult technical accounting personnel, and conduct investigative hearings before determining whether to refer a matter for formal administrative prosecution.

STAGE 01 / COMPLAINT

Information Reaches the Board

A complaint may come from a client, another regulator, a professional matter, a public record, or information otherwise obtained by the CBA.

STAGE 02 / INVESTIGATION

Records and Explanations Are Examined

Enforcement personnel may request accounting documents, seek written responses, interview individuals, and evaluate the professional standards relevant to the complaint.

STAGE 03 / INVESTIGATIVE HEARING

Sworn Testimony May Be Taken

Some matters involve a CBA investigative hearing, often assisted by the Enforcement Advisory Committee, where a licensee may be questioned under oath before any formal Accusation is filed.

STAGE 04 / ENFORCEMENT DECISION

Closure, Citation, or Formal Referral

The CBA may close a matter, issue an authorized citation, or refer the case to the California Attorney General's Office for formal disciplinary proceedings.

STAGE 05 / ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION

Formal Charges May Be Contested

An Accusation identifies alleged violations. A qualifying contested matter can proceed through the Office of Administrative Hearings before an administrative law judge.

STAGE 06 / BOARD DECISION

The CBA Determines the Disposition

The agency considers the administrative law judge's proposed decision under the governing procedure and ultimately issues or adopts the legally operative disciplinary decision.

An investigative finding, citation, formal Accusation, proposed administrative decision, and final disciplinary order have different legal consequences. The defense strategy should reflect that distinction.

A Distinct California Procedure

What Happens at a California CPA Investigative Hearing?

A California CPA may be directed to appear at an investigative hearing before the CBA has filed formal disciplinary charges. This is not the same proceeding as a contested hearing on an Accusation.

Business and Professions Code section 5103 authorizes investigative hearings. The board's enforcement materials explain that an investigative hearing may be conducted with the assistance of its Enforcement Advisory Committee, known as the EAC.

Questions Are Asked Under Oath

The licensee is placed under oath, and questions and answers are recorded by a certified court reporter. The hearing is used to obtain evidence and allow the CPA to present an account of the matters under investigation.

Technical Accounting Evidence Matters

Questions may involve the engagement scope, audit documentation, applicable professional standards, who performed or supervised particular work, and the reasoning supporting disputed conclusions.

Legal Counsel May Attend

The CBA's enforcement materials recognize that an attorney may accompany the CPA at an investigative hearing. Preparation should account for the documents, issues, and potential consequences of the recorded testimony.

The EAC Is Advisory

The Enforcement Advisory Committee helps evaluate technical issues and provides recommendations within the investigative process. It does not itself issue the board's final disciplinary decision.

The Transcript Has a Different Status

According to the CBA's Enforcement Handbook, investigative hearing transcripts are maintained as part of the confidential investigation and may become available through discovery if a formal Accusation follows.

Different Notices, Different Rules

California CPA Board Response Deadlines

California does not use one response deadline for every accountancy enforcement matter. A CBA inquiry, citation, and formal Accusation arise under different procedural provisions.

16 CCR § 52

Board Inquiries

Licensees must respond to qualifying CBA inquiries within 30 days. The rule also addresses subpoena responses, making requested records available, appearing when properly directed, and providing truthful information.

A request for workpapers should be assessed for relevance, scope, professional confidentiality, and any applicable legal protections.

Generally 30 days under the inquiry rule.
16 CCR § 95.5

Citation Appeals

A person or entity served with a CBA citation may contest the citation by a written appeal generally within 30 calendar days of issuance.

The appeal may challenge the alleged violation, required corrective action, compliance period, or fine. Failure to contest a citation can result in a final order under the rule.

Generally 30 calendar days from issuance.
Government Code § 11506

Formal Accusations

A respondent generally has 15 days after service of a formal Accusation to file a Notice of Defense. The notice can request a hearing and raise authorized objections and defenses.

Failure to file ordinarily waives the right to a hearing, although the agency retains specified discretion to accept a later notice or grant a hearing.

Generally 15 days after service.
Missing the Notice of Defense deadline does not automatically revoke a CPA license. The consequences are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act, including waiver of hearing rights and applicable default procedures. A default decision is a legal possibility, not an automatic revocation on the sixteenth day.
Developing the Defense Record

What Evidence Matters in a California CPA Licensing Case?

A meaningful licensing defense must examine what the CPA actually agreed to perform, the standards applicable at the time, the information available, and the factual basis for the board's conclusions.

In technically complex matters, the evidence may require analysis by a qualified accounting professional in addition to legal review.

01 / Engagement

Scope and Responsibilities

Engagement letters, client instructions, assignment limits, firm policies, supervisory roles, and evidence identifying who performed or approved the work.

02 / Documentation

Workpapers and Supporting Records

Audit evidence, tax files, financial records, workpaper review notes, testing, communications, and contemporaneous documentation.

03 / Technical Analysis

Applicable Professional Standards

Generally accepted accounting or auditing principles, applicable attest requirements, ethical duties, and the standards actually in effect during the engagement.

04 / Professional Conduct

Knowledge and Decision-Making

Evidence of the CPA's actual knowledge, professional judgment, communications, independence considerations, and the circumstances of a disputed decision.

05 / Compliance

Education, Peer Review, and Licensing

Continuing education records, peer review documentation, permit status, firm responsibilities, regulatory submissions, and previous compliance history.

06 / Outside Matters

Other Agency and Court Records

Relevant SEC, PCAOB, IRS, criminal, civil, or other licensing records, including orders and findings that may have a legally defined effect on the CBA proceeding.

Preserve the original record before preparing supplemental explanations. Changes to engagement documentation, reconstructed materials, and subsequent annotations should be evaluated under applicable recordkeeping standards. Do not alter or delete original evidence in a way that conceals the historical record.
Formal Administrative Discipline

Defending a California CPA Against a Formal Accusation

A formal Accusation alleges violations of the Accountancy Act, board regulations, or both. It is a charging document, not a final finding that the CPA committed the alleged misconduct.

When a case proceeds to formal litigation, the California Attorney General's Office typically represents the board. A contested matter may be heard by an administrative law judge through the Office of Administrative Hearings, or OAH.

Review Each Charged Ground

Identify the particular Business and Professions Code or regulatory provisions alleged, the professional conduct described, and whether the asserted facts satisfy the governing elements.

Obtain and Analyze Available Discovery

Evaluate the investigative record, witness material, documents, technical analyses, and the applicable administrative discovery procedures, including Government Code sections 11507.5 through 11507.7.

Prepare the Administrative Hearing

Organize exhibits, develop legal arguments, assess witness testimony, prepare the CPA and other witnesses, and determine whether professional accounting testimony is needed.

Evaluate the Proposed Decision

Under Government Code section 11517, an administrative law judge hearing a case alone ordinarily prepares a proposed decision. The CBA may adopt it, reduce or mitigate the proposed penalty, or take other action authorized by the statute.

Review the Final Order

Once the CBA issues or adopts a final decision, the defense must examine the findings, sanctions, effective date, compliance obligations, and any available judicial-review procedure.

Disciplinary Outcomes

California CPA Consent Orders, Probation, Suspension, and Revocation

A California accountancy matter may resolve through case closure, a citation, an authorized negotiated disposition, or a contested disciplinary decision. The available sanction depends on the violation, governing statute, and applicable order.

Business and Professions Code section 5100 authorizes specified discipline. The CBA's Disciplinary Guidelines and Model Orders, 11th edition, effective July 1, 2026, provide current sanction guidance for relevant disciplinary matters.

Citations and Corrective Orders

A citation may involve an administrative fine, an order of correction or abatement, or other authorized requirements. A citation is generally distinct from formal professional discipline, but failure to comply with a final citation can create additional disciplinary exposure.

Stipulated Settlements and Probation

An agreement may include factual admissions, terms of probation, specified compliance requirements, practice restrictions, or a stayed disciplinary penalty. The actual language of the stipulated order governs.

Suspension and Revocation

The CBA may impose suspension or revocation where authorized and justified under the governing law. A final order may affect professional services, firm responsibilities, public licensing status, and future restoration requirements.

A negotiated disciplinary order deserves the same careful review as a contested decision. Counsel should examine the legal findings, practice conditions, continuing education, probation terms, potential investigation and prosecution costs, reporting consequences, and what happens if an order is violated. The disciplinary guidelines do not guarantee any specific negotiated result.
Outside Proceedings and Disclosure

California CPA Reporting Requirements and Multi-State Consequences

Business and Professions Code section 5063 requires California licensees to report specified events, generally within 30 days under the applicable triggering provisions. These reporting duties are distinct from the duty to answer an ordinary board inquiry.

Qualifying events can involve criminal dispositions, discipline by other licensing authorities, SEC or PCAOB investigations, and certain civil judgments or other professional matters. The statute must be applied to the particular event and its procedural status.

Criminal Matters

Section 5063 identifies specified convictions and dispositions. Its definition of conviction may reach certain pleas or findings before ordinary criminal appellate proceedings have concluded. An arrest alone should not be treated as automatically equivalent to a covered conviction.

Other State Licensing Actions

Discipline involving another state accountancy credential can raise California reporting or disciplinary questions. The grounds, timing, and consequences depend on the governing provisions.

SEC and PCAOB Proceedings

Specified Securities and Exchange Commission investigations, Wells-related notices, and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board investigations may carry reporting obligations before any final sanction is entered.

Civil Professional Liability Matters

Certain judgments and other legally defined events may be reportable. A civil claim or settlement does not, merely by existing, establish a state licensing violation.

Professional Organization Actions

AICPA ethics matters and professional membership consequences should be distinguished from state licensing discipline. Their legal effect depends on the applicable regulatory or organizational rules.

Out-of-State CPAs

California Practice Privilege Restrictions Are Different From License Discipline

An accountant licensed in another state may be permitted to practice in California under statutory practice privileges. The CBA's authority over those privileges is different from its authority to suspend or revoke a California-issued CPA license.

BPC § 5096.4

Administrative Suspension

The CBA or its executive officer may issue an immediately effective administrative suspension of certain practice privileges without prior notice or hearing for investigative and compliance-related purposes.

The statute provides an opportunity to appeal and request a hearing within 30 days. The order and applicable statutory conditions determine the available procedure.

The statute expressly states that administrative suspension under this section is not discipline.
Other Practice Privilege Action

Separate Disciplinary Exposure

The CBA may also exercise statutory disciplinary authority over conduct involving California practice privileges. Not every restriction results from the same statutory ground or follows the same procedure.

A nonresident CPA should identify the issuing state, underlying license status, California practice privilege, and any notice concerning suspension, revocation, or the ability to continue particular engagements.

Practice authority must be established from the actual statute, license status, and order.
After a Final Decision

California CPA License Appeals and Reinstatement

A judicial challenge to a disciplinary order and a later request to restore a revoked license are different legal proceedings.

Judicial Review

Challenging a Final CBA Decision

California Government Code section 11523 provides for judicial review of qualifying final administrative decisions through a petition for writ of mandate, subject to the applicable statutes and judicial procedures.

The general filing period is tied to the last day reconsideration can be ordered, with specific provisions affecting record requests and other timing issues.

The appeal or writ process ordinarily examines the legality of agency action and the administrative record rather than beginning the disciplinary case again.

The actual final order and governing deadline control.
Restoration

Reinstatement or Reduction of Penalty

Business and Professions Code section 5115 allows qualifying licensees to petition the CBA for reinstatement or reduction of penalty after the applicable statutory period.

A revoked or surrendered license may be eligible for a petition after at least one year, subject to a longer qualifying period specified in the relevant board decision.

Eligibility to petition does not require the CBA to grant restoration. The applicant's prior discipline, current qualifications, evidence, and statutory requirements must be evaluated.

Reinstatement is separate from overturning the original order.
Our Defense Approach

How Ratliff Jackson LLP Handles California CPA Licensing Matters

California CPA defense requires attention to both administrative law and the underlying accounting work. Counsel's role is to identify the legal issue, examine the evidence, address procedural requirements, and evaluate the requested disciplinary disposition.

01

Identify the Regulator and Procedural Stage

Review the CBA communication, deadlines, potential parallel proceedings, and whether the matter involves an investigation, citation, sworn investigative hearing, Accusation, or final order.

02

Examine the Accounting Record

Analyze engagement documentation, professional standards, communications, roles, and technical issues, including the need for qualified accounting assistance.

03

Prepare Regulatory Responses

Address inquiry letters, subpoenas, production scope, written submissions, reporting duties, and the potential consequences of statements in related proceedings.

04

Prepare for Investigative or Disciplinary Hearings

Review the issues likely to be examined, prepare testimony, develop legal and technical arguments, and organize evidence relevant to the actual allegations.

05

Evaluate Settlement and Sanction Terms

Examine proposed findings, stipulated orders, probation requirements, suspension or revocation exposure, practice restrictions, and collateral reporting obligations.

06

Address the Final Disposition

Review any final order, determine compliance obligations, and assess judicial review, reinstatement, or related licensing consequences when applicable.

The defense objective depends on the record and stage of the matter. An investigation may require clarification and evidence preservation. A formal Accusation may require litigation preparation. A proposed settlement may require detailed review of the sanction and its longer-term professional consequences.
Official California Regulatory Library

California CPA Laws, Enforcement Guidance, and Disciplinary Resources

The California Board of Accountancy publishes distinct sources for governing law, investigations, professional standards, pending formal charges, disciplinary decisions, and out-of-state practice privileges. These resources help identify which rules apply to the current issue.

01 Statutory Authority

California Accountancy Act

Official index to Business and Professions Code provisions governing license requirements, investigations, reporting, disciplinary grounds, practice privileges, and reinstatement.

Review the Accountancy Act →
02 Professional Rules

California Accountancy Regulations

Title 16, division 1 includes the response-to-inquiry rule, ethics requirements, client confidentiality, independence, technical standards, and peer review provisions.

Review CBA Regulations →
03 Investigation Procedure

Enforcement Handbook for Licensees

The board explains complaint investigations, investigative hearings under oath, citations, formal Accusations, hearing procedures, and possible disciplinary outcomes.

Read the Enforcement Handbook →
04 Public Enforcement

CBA Enforcement FAQs

Explains the distinction between nonpublic complaints and public citations, Accusations, and disciplinary orders, along with other enforcement questions.

Explore Enforcement FAQs →
05 Current Sanction Guidance

Disciplinary Guidelines and Model Orders

The board confirms that the 11th edition became effective July 1, 2026, and identifies the approved regulatory documents under title 16, section 98.

Review Approved Guidelines →
06 Pending Charges

Formal Accusations Filed

The CBA provides access to pending Accusations and explains that allegations in those documents are not final determinations of wrongdoing.

Review Formal Accusations →
07 License Status

License Lookup and Enforcement Definitions

Explains public licensing information and distinctions between clear, probationary, restricted, suspended, surrendered, and revoked status.

Understand License Status →
08 Out-of-State CPAs

Practice Privilege Reporting Requirements

Official guidance on circumstances requiring notification, cessation of California practice, and the possible impact of outside discipline on practice privileges.

Review Practice Privilege Rules →
09 Licensee Questions

CBA Licensee FAQs

Official explanations of ongoing licensing responsibilities and professional practice questions, including issues affecting out-of-state practitioners.

Explore Licensee FAQs →
Frequently Asked Questions

California CPA Board Investigations and Disciplinary Defense

These answers address California Board of Accountancy matters. The controlling document, applicable law, and procedural stage determine the actual requirements.

Who investigates complaints against CPAs in California?

The California Board of Accountancy investigates alleged violations of the Accountancy Act and its regulations. Its Enforcement Division may review documents, obtain information, use technical accounting assistance, and conduct investigative hearings under Business and Professions Code section 5103.

Does a California CPA board complaint automatically become public?

No. The CBA explains that complaints are generally not public information. If a matter results in a citation or formal enforcement action, the relevant citation, Accusation, or disciplinary action may become part of the public regulatory record.

How long does a CPA have to respond to a CBA inquiry?

Under title 16, California Code of Regulations, section 52, a licensee generally must respond to a board inquiry within 30 days and make requested files, working papers, and other documents available. The rule separately addresses subpoenas, appearances, truthful responses, and obstruction.

What happens at a California CPA investigative hearing?

An investigative hearing is part of the CBA's evidence-gathering process. The CPA may be questioned under oath, with testimony recorded by a certified court reporter. The Enforcement Advisory Committee may assist, and the CPA may have an attorney present. The hearing is not itself a final disciplinary determination.

Is a CBA citation the same as formal discipline?

No. The CBA distinguishes citations from formal discipline. A citation may include a fine or corrective order. Under title 16, section 95.5, a citation generally may be contested by written appeal within 30 calendar days of issuance. Failure to comply with a final citation can create additional disciplinary exposure.

What is the deadline to file a Notice of Defense to a California CPA Accusation?

Government Code section 11506 generally provides 15 days after service of an Accusation to file a Notice of Defense. Failure to file ordinarily waives the right to a hearing, subject to the agency's statutory discretion concerning later filings or hearings. Revocation is not automatic merely because the deadline passes.

Does an administrative law judge make the final CPA disciplinary decision?

When a contested matter is heard by an administrative law judge alone, the judge generally issues a proposed decision. Under Government Code section 11517, the CBA has authority to adopt the proposal, mitigate a penalty, or take other statutorily authorized action before a final decision is entered.

What sanctions can the California Board of Accountancy impose?

Depending on the established violation and applicable statute, the CBA may impose censure, practice restrictions, probationary terms, suspension, revocation, or other authorized sanctions. The board's 11th edition Disciplinary Guidelines and Model Orders became effective July 1, 2026. Particular outcomes are not guaranteed.

Must California CPAs report outside regulatory or criminal matters?

Business and Professions Code section 5063 requires reporting of specified events, generally within 30 days under its applicable triggering provisions. Covered matters may include qualifying convictions, outside disciplinary action, certain SEC and PCAOB proceedings, and specified civil judgments. Not every allegation is automatically reportable.

Can California suspend an out-of-state CPA's practice privilege without a hearing first?

Under Business and Professions Code section 5096.4, certain administrative suspensions of California practice privileges may become effective without prior notice or hearing. The law provides an opportunity to appeal and request a hearing within 30 days. The statute expressly states that this administrative suspension is not discipline.

Can a California CPA appeal a final disciplinary decision?

Potentially. Government Code section 11523 provides for judicial review of qualifying administrative decisions through a petition for writ of mandate. Filing requirements and timing depend on the applicable statutes, reconsideration period, and particular order. Filing for review does not necessarily stay an effective disciplinary restriction.

What does a California CPA license defense lawyer do?

Counsel evaluates the allegations and governing accountancy law, reviews professional records, addresses board inquiries and subpoenas, prepares investigative hearings and formal defenses, handles administrative proceedings, examines stipulated settlements, and assesses sanctions and related licensing consequences.

California CPA License Defense

A California Board Investigation Requires Attention to Both the Accounting Record and the Disciplinary Process.

The CBA may examine technical accounting decisions, professional conduct, licensing obligations, and evidence from other proceedings. The defense should begin with the actual allegations, applicable standards, and procedural requirements.

Ratliff Jackson LLP represents CPAs and licensed professionals in regulatory and disciplinary matters. If you have received a CBA inquiry, investigative hearing notice, citation, Accusation, or proposed disciplinary order, we can evaluate the record and the legal options available at the current stage.